Summarizing Trumpism with One Quote from LBJ

LBJ

I can summarize Trumpism with one quote from LBJ. But before I begin, we need to think about the history of class, economics, and politics as they affect minorities in our country. No one can deny our country’s record on these issues. It has been a failure. Let’s start with the climate in our country when former President Lyndon B. Johnson (LBJ) made a quote that summarizes Trumpism today. This quote was made in the 1960s. Then (not now), the country was divided by several issues, including the intersection of politics and racial tensions. Sound familiar?

Democrats and Republicans made policy shifts then that still stand today. Democrats, led by President Kennedy and later Johnson, inched toward Civil Rights reforms that would benefit minorities and marginalized people. Republicans, led by a new dependence on Southern white voters, galvanized around keeping class and economic systems intact that benefited whites in America. It was quite a showdown, and it is a battle that continues now.

With the volatility of life in the 1960s as a backdrop, LBJ offered the following quote. It summarizes Trumpism today…

 

“I’ll tell you what’s at the bottom of it. If you can convince the lowest white man that he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you”. – President Lyndon Johnson

 

  • Trump and people who think like him have convinced, and in some cases, reaffirmed, “the lowest white man’s” belief that they are better than people of color. Therefore, they can base their anxieties about race, class, economics, and a myriad of other issues on people of color. People of color are the problem! As a result of this thinking, they can scapegoat black people for crime while blaming immigrants for taking jobs. They must keep the myth alive that their skin color makes them superior to “the best colored man”.

 

  • Trump and people who think like him have convinced “the lowest white man” that a vote for a Republican is always in their best interest, even when Republicans oppose things they need. Some of “the lowest white men” and their families depend on social programs, yet Republican agendas consistently cut or try to completely end these programs. Yet they are convinced Republican will take care of them on other issues, like scapegoating black people for crime while blaming immigrants for taking jobs.

 

  • Trump and people who think like them have convinced “the lowest white man” that conspiracy theories abound, and all of them are designed to destroy white people in America. Most of these theories help “the best colored man”, and dare I say, women more than “the lowest white man.” So, minorities and immigrants get welfare, free healthcare, affirmative action, and even separate schools that whites do not get. Conspiracy theories like these run rampant and fuel anti-minority and anti-immigrant sentiment.

 

  • Trump and people who think like him have convinced “the lowest white man” that the county he knows, and loves will disappear as demographics shift. It’s a fact; whites in America will become the “minority” when their numbers are compared to non-white people in this century. Our country is getting browner, and this means America will change. White people will lose their rights! To counter this threat, the “lowest white man” believes in the “need” to make America great again (by keeping America white).

 

  • Trump and people who think like him have convinced “the lowest white man” the only way to stem the threat minorities and immigrants present is to prepare for the next civil war. White supremacists carried out terrorist activities throughout our history to terrorize and intimidate. Today we see these acts as a desperate attempt to fight back and stop minorities and immigrants. Why do you think “the lowest white man” refuses to give up his Second Amendment right to own guns, especially guns designed for war? He needs them just in time to make America great again.

 

  • Trump and people who think like him have convinced “the lowest white man” that he will be at the bottom of society if “the best colored man” takes over America (see Barack Obama). We can go a step further. They are convinced, and probably afraid, that all the injustices perpetrated against people of color in America, will be done to them. Maybe they will be imprisoned at higher rates. Maybe they will receive lower wages. Maybe they will have their voting rights restricted. What happens when “the lowest white man” is treated like a second-class citizen?

 

I believe that most white people in America do not agree with “the lowest white man”. But some are not ready for the changes future demographics will bring. They think in terms of one or two issues Trump, and “the lowest white man” fear. It is unfortunate that Trumpism relies on both sets of people to make America great again. It relies on “the lowest white man” to vote for him because of his paranoia. It plays on the fear of some white people who are afraid of what will happen as the country becomes darker.

Lyndon Johnson said it best. I’m sure he had no idea his words would still apply in 2019… and 2029… and 2039…

 

Need more proof? These stories are hot off the press…

 

New Jersey Police Chief Who Called Donald Trump ‘Last Hope for White People’ On Trial for Hate Crime

White supremacy connected to rise in hate crimes, ADL reports

A Former ICE Chief Melts Down

Candace Owens to Congress: White Supremacy and White Nationalism Are Not a Problem

Trump Official Says Statue of Liberty Poem is About Europeans

 

Gary A. McAbee created the Wake Up/Rise Up Black America blog to have a powerful voice and positive impact in African-American neighborhoods, communities, and society. The articles posted are not only for African-Americans, but for all people due to their relevance and cultural significance. Along with his other blog, Motivation for the World, Gary can get people talking about issues that affect us all. He is the proud author of three self-help books: Wake Up! 42 Ways to Improve Black America Now!, the follow-up Rise Up! 42 Additional Ways to Improve Black America Now! , and Defining Success: One Word at a Time.

 

Join Gary A. McAbee on social media!

 

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/garymcabee

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/wakeupandriseup

Twitter: https://twitter.com/McAbeeGary

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/garymotivation/

Jay-Z and the NFL: Time Will Tell

NFL Headquarters

NFL Headquarters: New York, NY  Photo courtesy of hiconsumption.com

Jay-Z and the NFL: Time Will Tell

By now we have had a chance to digest the news that Jay-Z has signed a partnership agreement with the NFL. This agreement paves the way for him to be involved in decision-making that affects the league. It also paves the way for him to become an owner in some capacity in the future. I have read a lot about the deal and watched as two camps of people emerged: those who support his actions and those who criticize his actions. Naturally, as an African American writer, I am looking at this issue primarily with an African American viewpoint.

Those who agree with Jay-Z’s partnership with the NFL believe it is good to have a black person with a seat at the NFL ownership table. They think his presence will influence change. Advocates hope he can get Colin Kaepernick on an NFL roster. Finally, they believe Jay-Z will force NFL owners to think differently about the players they employ. I agree with these opinions (but it is up to Jay-Z to make this work).

Critics of Jay-Z are saying he is a sellout to Colin Kaepernick, black NFL players, and black people in general. People think he is being selfish, and out the chase more money and fame. Some say he’s misguided because he is cooperating with the oppressors. Others say he will become just like the other owners in the NFL: taskmasters who are exploiting black players. While I understand and respect each one of these viewpoints, I disagree with all of them. I have reasons that few people have stated on either side of the argument.

People who achieve the level of success Jay-Z has achieved think differently. It is one of the reasons why they are so successful. There is a high probability that most people have never met anyone who thinks quite like Jay-Z, Bill Gates, Oprah Winfrey, and so many other high achievers. They are rare. The way they think is rare. We should remember this fact as we throw criticism their way.

Believe me, this is not meant to put down anyone and I’m sorry if it sounds like one. Before we criticize Jay-Z, there are a few questions we might want to ask ourselves.  Do we think at a level high enough to truly grasp what he is trying to accomplish? Seriously, do we know how hard it is to become a millionaire? Now multiply that by 1,000 and that’s the “level” of thinking we’re talking about. As it relates to the NFL, most of us are thinking about “minor” details while we can assume Jay-Z is thinking about a much bigger picture.

We think Jay-Z should be thinking about kneeling players on a sideline; he should be thinking about opening the lines of communication with those players. We are thinking about Colin Kaepernick being blackballed; he is thinking about how to effect change, so it never happens again. We think about another black player being used by a white owner; he is thinking about how to sit at the table with white owners to change the power structure that’s been in place since the inception of the NFL.

We should give Jay-Z the same benefit of doubt when joining the NFL fraternity that we gave him when we bought his albums. No one questioned his ability or motivation when he grabbed the mic. We were all in on Jay-Z when described his upbringing in his songs. We were rocking Roc-a-Wear everything because it was his clothing brand. Now when he rises to a level well beyond record sales is when we doubt him?

Personally, I do not put my trust in any human being in any given situation. This includes Jay-Z and his attempt to break into the NFL. Add to the mix the amount of money involved, and it wouldn’t surprise me if Jay-Z is in in for all the selfish reasons his critics have said. It wouldn’t surprise me if he becomes just like the other owners in the NFL. It wouldn’t surprise me if never does anything to help black players.  It wouldn’t surprise me if he does “sellout”.

But I think he deserves the chance to “prove” to us what he’s joining the NFL ownership club to accomplish. Jay-Z turned his street corner hustle into a lucrative rap career. Jay-Z turned his street corner hustle into a billion-dollar brand. Jay-Z turned his street corner hustle into a deal with the NFL. So, it is his right to decide whether to use that same street corner hustle for selfish reasons or to influence change in the NFL. He has worked tirelessly to get in position to have a seat at the NFL table.

I hope Jay-Z uses his seat at the table wisely and holds the boardroom door open for others. Time will tell.

 

Gary A. McAbee created the Wake Up/Rise Up Black America blog to have a powerful voice and positive impact in African-American neighborhoods, communities, and society. The articles posted are not only for African-Americans, but for all people due to their relevance and cultural significance. Along with his other blog, Motivation for the World, Gary can get people talking about issues that affect us all. He is the proud author of three self-help books: Wake Up! 42 Ways to Improve Black America Now!, the follow-up Rise Up! 42 Additional Ways to Improve Black America Now! , and Defining Success: One Word at a Time.

 

Join Gary A. McAbee on social media!

 

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/garymcabee

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/wakeupandriseup

Twitter: https://twitter.com/McAbeeGary

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/garymotivation/

 

Do You Get Mad, Indifferent, or Take Action?

Picket Sign

When you learn about injustices that occur on a daily basis, do you get mad, indifferent, or take action?

When you hear about another mass shooting, do you get mad, indifferent, or take action?

When you see someone do something politically incorrect, do you get mad, indifferent, or take action?

When you watch a video about a traffic stop gone bad, do you get mad, indifferent, or take action?

When you know someone is being taken advantage of, do you get mad, indifferent, or take action?

Getting mad is easy. In today’s cell phone driven society, people are recording life. We see a lot more things happening. We see more injustices unfold right before our eyes. A natural result is we finds thing to get outraged about, sometimes on a daily basis. Some of these things make us mad, but not mad enough to do anything. Sure we might comment on a post, or complain a little to a “listening” ear, but our “anger” does not elicit a response that will provide a solution or remedy.  We just don’t care enough to take action.

See: police misconduct

This leads to a feeling of being indifferent when certain things happen. Again, we are not moved to care enough to take action. Indifference sets in when we see or hear about the same injustice time and time again until it becomes normal. It no longer shocks, angers, or moves us in any way. We simply accept it. It gets worse when we justify injustice. We say things like: “that’s the way things are” or “he /she always does things like that”.  We rationalize things and dismiss them as if they are routine. Our indifference shows and remains until things change.

See: mass shootings

Taking action is the hard part. What things get you so upset that you must take action? I am sure the list starts with people we care about. Let some injustice fall upon a loved one. We will respond. But will we take action when something unfair happens to a total stranger? How about those times when we see something on social media? Shouldn’t we be moved to action then? I think we know why to take action: injustice anywhere is injustice everywhere. We have to learn when to take action and how to effect change. Then, we will make a difference when injustices occur.

See: Trump protests

I will leave you with this. When you see injustice, regardless of what it is and who it is against, do you get mad, indifferent, or take action? I suggest you figure out what gets you mad and take action. I also suggest you figure out what makes you indifferent change it into action. In both cases, you make a conscious decision o get involved. When more people get involved, more injustice gets eliminated.

It’s your move. Will You Get Mad, Indifferent, or Take Action?

Another Clothing Brand Gets It Wrong… Still Down?

Knowledge

Here we go again. Another clothing brand makes a racist product or ad and people start to scream boycott. How about we “boycott” these brands before we get evidence that these brands promoted something offensive? In other words, let’s start to improve our purchasing habits by being less materialistic and more practical. Let’s stop patronizing brands that promote a certain status or trend. By doing so, we will also cut out brands that are not made by us or for us. Black people its time to be better consumers.

We can start in many ways. However, given the spotlight currently on the clothing industry and brands, let’s start there. The clothing you buy, especially when it is made by “trendsetting” brands, reflects a mindset. It reflects a belief that wearing something with a trendy brand name is equal to a certain status. It means certain brand names make you appear to be wealthy. The clothing you buy means you want people to know you are wearing the “best” brands. It means you think materialistically when it comes to the clothing you buy.

For the record, I have never bought anything from Gucci, Prada, Fendi, Armani, or Ralph Lauren. I can add so many more brands to this list. First, for me it’s an economic issue. I can’t see myself paying top dollar for any article of clothing (except a business suit and complimentary shoes) just because it is made by a certain brand. Think about it, a clothing brand and a logo is an artificial concept. It is made up to give the illusion that it has a certain style or gives a certain status. It is a marketing tool designed to influence consumers to buy. In reality, it says nothing quality, dependability, value, or cost. Instead, clothing brands and logos speak to materialism.

Couple this information with our intrinsic need to be seen and respected, and it is easy to see why people gravitate toward name-brand items. Some of us must be seen wearing a certain logo! Next, we can also add celebrity endorsements of these products and brands to reasons why we wear these items. I get it. Celebrities, athletes, and entertainers need to have a certain look to get us to follow them. But does following them require buying like them? Does it mean we should also wear Gucci, Prada, and the like just because they do? They “have to” wear the logo, do you have to as well?

Now let’s discuss the elephant in the room: who do these companies really want to wear their products? I think these brands, and the executives who run them, love the fact that black people buy their products. Again, it’s an economic issue; our money is green too. However, I also suspect they are not happy about us wearing their products. A lot of it is not made for us! How do we know? Think about the sizing and cut of the material. Think about the colors and styles. Think about the marketing and advertising. Think about the decision-makers who work at these companies. None of it revolves around, nor caters to black people.

Need proof? You already know the stories. Gucci makes a dark brown turtleneck sweater with big, red lips as a cutout. Prada has a product line with black monkey-like characters with, big red lips. H&M sells monkey t-shirts and puts a black child wearing one in an ad. In 2019, can anyone tell me how these things go from idea, concept, creation, sale, and advertisement without someone noticing they are racially tinged? Or, maybe it was noticed and overlooked and ignored. Maybe they know that we, black people, will continue to patronize their brands despite seeing these issues.

Here are some things to think about…

Have you ever seen Bill Gates wearing Gucci?

Have you ever seen Denzel Washington in an ad for Prada?

Have you purchased a $200 or more jeans or purse, but do not carry $200 inside one of the pockets?

Have you seen racist or offensive ads from a company and still bought their products?

Have you ever heard any spokespeople for these brands say, “yes, we make this specifically for black people?”

 

I think it is time for black consumers to rethink their purchasing habits. (As a side note, in 2019 there are more choices than ever for black people to buy and support black-owned designs and clothing. At least we know these brands are created for us and by us.) I am not saying we should burn our Gucci or Prada collection. After all we “must” look good and fashion-conscious right? It would be nice you we stop wearing what we already have, but I digress. Instead, I am saying if a company or its spokespeople create a racially insensitive product or advertise it, we should stop buying from the company and stop patronizing their brands.

I love black celebrities, but I don’t need them telling me to boycott. I didn’t need them to tell me to buy these brands, so I don’t need them to tell me not to. I get to choose what I buy. My mindset tells me not to follow trends or brands to be viewed as trendy or rich. Too many people put too much stock in this, especially when brands are endorsed by celebrities or those who dress, and act like them. Too many people want to wear a logo as a status symbol. Too many people want to look “good.”

The decision not to patronize Gucci, Prada, and the like is personal choice for me regardless of what status they offer. Economics, dependability, value, and cost drive my purchasing habits. When it comes to clothing, I stick to a brand that delivers and these points. This includes brands made by black people. But you can believe that I will drop that brand if I see any racist of offensive products or advertising. It is my choice. It should be your choice too. Still down?

 

 

Gary A. McAbee created the Wake Up/Rise Up Black America blog to have a powerful voice and positive impact in African-American neighborhoods, communities, and society. The articles posted are not only for African-Americans, but for all people due to their relevance and cultural significance. Along with his other blog, Motivation for the World, Gary can get people talking about issues that affect us all. He is the proud author of three self-help books: Wake Up! 42 Ways to Improve Black America Now!, the follow-up Rise Up! 42 Additional Ways to Improve Black America Now! , and Defining Success: One Word at a Time.

 

Join Gary A. McAbee on social media!

 

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/garymcabee

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/wakeupandriseup

Twitter: https://twitter.com/McAbeeGary

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/garymotivation/

I am Trumped Out

Decay 1

Marker at the entrance of the now defunct Trump Taj Mahal Casino in Atlantic City, NJ

I don’t know about you, but I am tired of Donald Trump. I am tired of his Presidency. I am tired of his antics. I am tired of his tweets. I am tired of his lies and falsehoods. I am tired of his misrepresentations. I am tired of his insults. I am tired of his bullying. I am tired of his family. I am tired of his enablers. I am tired of his supporters. I am tired of those stupid red MAGA hats. I am tired of him period.

I am Trumped out.

I hope he leaves office soon. I believe anyone would be better as President than Donald Trump. I’d take Mike Pence for a few years. I’d take George W. Bush again if it was possible. I’d take Mitt Romney. Honestly, I would take any Republican over Trump, and that includes Mitch McConnell (but not by much). There are plenty of Republicans who would be better at this than Donald Trump. At least they would be more Presidential. Mr. Trump does not have a Presidential bone in his body. It shows every day.

I am Trumped out.

I am convinced that he is the worst President in my lifetime. Since I was barely born when Richard Nixon was run out of office, I will not include him. You don’t have to be a Presidential historian to figure it out. Just think about the political climate we had in recent years. Think about our relationships with our friends and allies around the world. Think about our dealings with our enemies and hostile governments around the world. Hell think about how we debated our politics. All these things have taken a turn for the worse with Donald Trump at the helm.

I am Trumped out.

Trump is worse than Gerald Ford, the man who pardoned Nixon and his criminal activity. He is worse than Jimmy Carter, the man who let the hostages sit in Iran. Trump is worse than Ronald Reagan, the man who sold arms to Iran to fund Nicaragua. He is worse than George H. Bush, the man who promised “no new taxes” and then raised taxes. Trump is worse than Bill Clinton, the man who lied about his Oval Office escapades. He is worse than George W. Bush, the man who never found a single weapon of mass destruction in Iraq. Trump is worse than Barack Obama, the man who let an embassy fall in Benghazi. Even at their worst moments, each of the last seven Presidents are better than Donald Trump.

I am Trumped out.

I am ready to turn the page on this farce of a Presidency. Let the history books and historians who write them retell you what you already know. In the words of Donald Trump, his Presidency is “a disaster.” He, his handlers, supporters, and a few loyal republicans, are the only ones who will not acknowledge he is failing “bigly.” He “hires the best people”, only to see them investigated and charged. He knows more things than everyone but calls the Bible book “Two Corinthians.” He wanted to deny aid to Puerto Rico, in part because “it’s surrounded by water, big water.”

I am Trumped out.

If you agree with me that’s great. If you don’t that’s great too. We can agree to agree or agree to disagree. But I am tired of Donald Trump. I am tired of the uncertainty his Presidency has delivered. I am tired of the revolving door of people who work, and then leave the White House. I am tired of his ability to appoint Supreme Court and lower court judges (which will impact our country for the next 30 years). I am tired of Melania Trump being dragged through this nightmare. I am tired of him blaming Obama, the Bushes, Hillary Clinton, Robert Mueller, and anyone else but himself. And finally, I am tired of his stupid freakin’ border wall.

I am Trumped out.

 

Gary A. McAbee created the Wake Up/Rise Up Black America blog to have a powerful voice and positive impact in African-American neighborhoods, communities, and society. The articles posted are not only for African-Americans, but for all people due to their relevance and cultural significance. Along with his other blog, Motivation for the World, Gary can get people talking about issues that affect us all. He is the proud author of three self-help books: Wake Up! 42 Ways to Improve Black America Now!, the follow-up Rise Up! 42 Additional Ways to Improve Black America Now! , and Defining Success: One Word at a Time.

 

Join Gary A. McAbee on social media!

 

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/garymcabee

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/wakeupandriseup

Twitter: https://twitter.com/McAbeeGary

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/garymotivation/

 

Voting: Vote Suppression 101

No Vote

Voting: Vote Suppression 101

 

I consider denying voting privileges one of the great disqualifiers. Disqualifiers are things that are taken away from people to prevent them for being active participants in our society. Denying the right to voter meant to disqualify millions of people. It is a way to silence opposing viewpoints, deny the rights of others, and prevent some people from contributing to our system of government. We know there is one political party who actively seeks to deny people from exercising their right to vote. The question for me is very simple: why?

We have heard the main “reason” stopping, or at least scrutinizing the right to vote for some people. Illegal voting is the claim thrown about by those who want tighter voting restrictions. However, study after study has shown that illegal voting is rare in our country. Yet stopping “widespread” illegal voting is a winning argument for those who want to disqualify others by preventing them from voting. It is a scare tactic. It is fear-mongering. It is wrong, and it must be stopped.

What are the ways that voting is being suppressed in our country? The following list contains several ways votes are being suppressed, voters are being intimidated, and votes are being challenged…

  1. Gerrymandering: also known as drawing and redrawing of political maps that represent voting blocs. As maps are drawn, they focus of the demographics of a given area which tells and predicts voting patterns and trends. Winning districts is equal to having additional representatives in government. If you can draw political maps that favor your party winning more districts, then that party will have more representation. One political party has a habit of gerrymandering and fight against efforts to fix poorly drawn political maps.

 

  1. Limiting early voting: reducing the days in which people can vote in advance of an election. Early voting, especially on weekends, is convenient for those who work abnormal schedules or multiple jobs. People like this may have a hard time getting to the polls on election day. They are also more likely to be poor, minority, and older voters. Early voting gives these voters options. One political party has a habit of limiting early voting, especially in areas where there are poorer, minority, and elderly voters.

 

  1. Closing polling places: reducing the amounts of polling places where people can exercise their right to vote. The amount of polling places should be based on the number of eligible voters in each area. Simply put, areas with more voters need more polling places. It should be based on a mathematical formula, maybe one polling place per 10,00 eligible voters. This would cut down on waiting times on election day too. One political party has a habit of trying to close polling places, especially in densely populated areas where there are poorer, minority, and elderly voters.

 

  1. Stripping voter rolls: or removing names from the voter rolls based on technicalities that the voter may not know exist. Eligible voters are being purging from voting rolls due to issues like incorrect addresses, spelling issues, and even hyphenated names. All these issues can, and should be allowed to be, corrected on voting day. However, in some places voters are also being removed from voting rolls for not voting in previous elections. This is more difficult to fix on election day. One political party has a habit of striping voters off voting rolls while the voters are unaware it is happening to them.

 

  1. Challenging voter Identification: having the correct voting identification can be a challenge. Not everyone possesses a driver’s license, so a non-driver state identification should be usable. Students, especially those from out-of-state, would not possess either identification, so their student identification should be acceptable. Elderly people may not have any of these forms of identification, so a list of acceptable forms of identification should be drafted from them (similar to forms of identification needed to complete I-9 forms for employment). One political party has a habit of challenging all of this and making it difficult for anyone who votes that does not possess a driver’s license.

 

  1. Registering to vote: should be allowed up to and including election day. A country whose economy is based on computers and programming should be able to have a universal system to record and add eligible voters regardless of when they register. We have some states that has strict cut-off dates from registering to vote. Then we have others that somehow find a way to allow same-day registration and voting on election day. There is an astonishing lack of consistency attached to voter registration that affects, local, state, and national elections. One political party has a habit of pushing for limiting the times for new registrations by eligible voters.

 

  1. Restoring voting rights: anyone who has had their voting rights have been taken away should have the ability to have their rights restored. This includes people improperly removed from voting rolls. It also includes former felons, who have paid their debt to society by fulfilling a sentence issued by a judge or court proceeding. Once their sentence is complete, then their voting rights should be restored. Again, people who fall into this category are more likely to be poorer and minorities. Once political party has a habit of blocking restoring voting rights to those purged from voting rolls and to those who served time in prison due to crime.

 

  1. Political advertisements and robocalls: are tactics used to suppress the vote by providing false information or intimidation. Political advertisements are misleading and can make voters think twice about heading to the polls. Some ads have said things like criminal background checks, warrants, and child-support payments will be checked at polling places. None of these things are true. Robocalls, or recorded phone calls, often give misleading information like wrong dates and times to go vote. One political party has a habit of spreading falsities about the voting experience both at the polls and through ad and robocalls.

 

  1. Integrity of voting machines and counting: voting machines should be as secures as ATM machines. For some strange reason, we are not concerned when we stick a card in an ATM and it has a record of our monetary transactions. The same should be true for voting. We have voting machines that change votes. We have voting machines that do not list all the candidates or list them in different orders than sample ballots distributed to voters. We have issues with counting during every election cycle, which forces recounts and additional confusion. Again, it is astonishing that we do not have a standard voting machine or technology used nationwide. Instead, each state, and in most instances, each community has their own way of voting and recording votes. One political party has a habit of blocking upgrades to our voting machines and technology that would secure the integrity of voting.

 

  1. Secretary of State: is the elected official responsible for voting in their state, Of course, the Secretary of State belongs to a political party. Their decisions about each of the previous 9 voting issues raised here can be supported or rejected by the Secretary of State. It is amazing to me that a person n this capacity would be more wiling to find ways to discourage people from voting rather than encourage and find ways more people can vote. Yet disqualifying and discouraging people from voting happens time and time again in states across the country. These efforts are often spearheaded by the Secretaries of State in numerous states. One political party has the habit of having Secretaries of State who look to limit voting rules and regulations, often to the detriment of poorer, minority, elderly, and student voters.

 

I have laid out an extensive case that points to one fact: someone or some group, some politician, or politicians, and some elements of our voting system, are meant to disqualify and prevent some of our citizens from voting. Historically, this narrative fits with the history of voting rights in the United States. First, voting rights were only given to white males who owned land. This disqualified everyone else. Then it was given to other white males. This disqualified everyone else. Then it was given to women. This disqualified everyone else. Then it was given to minorities and all remaining citizens. This qualified everyone to vote.

However, tactics like those presented here were slowly, yet steadily implemented to take away the right to vote for many people. Isn’t it interesting that these tactics are more likely to negatively affect the people who were disqualified from voting the most: poorer, minority, and elderly voters. Add to that younger, student voters who are more likely to vote for one political party over another. The reasoning behind all of this is clear to me. Voting is a way to consolidate and keep political power that favors one group of people over others. Any disruption of this “system” is met with opposition in the form of preventing people from voting to change the “system”.

I put the blame for this directly on the political party who has a habit of making it harder from people to vote: the modern Republican party and those responsible for its leadership. They are fully aware of the demographic shift that is occurring in our country. In 30-50 years, they and their followers will become the minority in this country. This means there will be far less people who will vote for them and their conservative ideology. To defend against this, they use tactics to disqualify people from voting. Simultaneously they are using their elected officials, especially judges, to enact and enforce laws that will ensure their way of life and political “system” will continue to thrive and survive long after they are no longer the majority in our country. This is despicable, and it must be met with vigilance. We can’t allow people to be disqualified from voting.

Voting: Vote Suppression 101

 

 

 

Gary A. McAbee created the Wake Up/Rise Up Black America blog to have a powerful voice and positive impact in African-American neighborhoods, communities, and society. The articles posted are not only for African-Americans, but for all people due to their relevance and cultural significance. Along with his other blog, Motivation for the World, Gary can get people talking about issues that affect us all. He is the proud author of three self-help books: Wake Up! 42 Ways to Improve Black America Now!, the follow-up Rise Up! 42 Additional Ways to Improve Black America Now! , and Defining Success: One Word at a Time.

 

Join Gary A. McAbee on social media!

 

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/garymcabee

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/wakeupandriseup

Twitter: https://twitter.com/McAbeeGary

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/garymotivation/

 

 

 

Sexual Assault: We Wonder Why They Don’t Come Forward

Sexual Assault: We Wonder Why They Don’t Come Forward

Sexual Assault ribbon

There is something to be said about being a man because we are taught in both conscious and subconscious ways to behave in a certain way. We are taught to be tough and physical. We are taught to temper our feelings and emotions. We are taught to possess and conquer. All of these teachings may be important to our survival, but they come with a price tag: responsibility. When we use what we are taught as men irresponsibly, far too often it is women who face the consequences of our behavior. This is true when there are sexual assaults by men upon women.

If men are taught to be tough and physical, then it could be misconstrued that “no” does not mean “no.” If men are taught to temper our feeling and emotions, then it could be misconstrued that “no” does not mean “no.” If men are taught to possess and conquer, then it could be misconstrued that “no” does not mean “no.” Instead, “no” could mean a temporary denial that will be overcome one way or another.  Men live by the law of the jungle. It is the reality of being male.  It is one of the codes of manhood. Unfortunately, these factors work against women who are sexually assaulted when they speak up.

We wonder why they don’t come forward.

Men who take in the lessons of being tough and physical, tempering feelings and emotions, and possessing and conquering, protect each other. That protection may mean tacit approval. That protection may mean turning a blind eye. That protection may mean outright lying. Men who believe “no” is a temporary denial also promote the law of the jungle, reality of being male, and the code of manhood. They protect other men who feel the same way. That protection may mean tacit approval. That protection may mean turning a blind eye. That protection may mean outright lying.

We wonder why they don’t come forward.

 Imagine you are a victim of sexual assault, and you report it to authorities who are men. There is a possibility they believe in the male code of toughness and possession. It is a possibility they will temper their feelings and emotions toward the accuser. It is a possibility they believe in upholding the male code of protecting another man. It is a possibility they will not believe the accuser. If any of these things occur, it has to decrease the likelihood that the victim gets total cooperation from those who should protect and serve.

We wonder why they don’t come forward.

 A victim of sexual assault may experience subtle or outright character assassination at the hands of a man. Usually this will come from the accused, who will say anything to disparage the accuser. In higher profile cases, other men may help to investigate the victim in hopes of proving her wrong. It may be done to protect the accused man. It may be done to uphold the code. A perfect example of this is asking questions like “what was she wearing?” or “did she say no.” Both instances setup the victim for character assassination. In other words, her actions warranted the response she got. It was her fault.

We wonder why they don’t come forward.

 In many sexual assault cases, it is the accused man who is the “victim.” He could not turn down his urge to be tough and physical. He could not find any empathy for his victim because he tempers his feelings and emotions. He could not control his desire to possess and conquer. So he acted like man should when he committed the act of sexual assault. A perfect example of this is the mantra “boys will be boys.” I hate this because it says we know the code, we approve of the code, and we will not do anything to break the code.

We wonder why they don’t come forward.

 The victim of sexual assault has to live with the trauma of their experience for the rest of their life. I am sure it is a difficult process and something unimaginably hard to overcome. They also have to live with the feelings and emotions associated with attacks on their character and honesty as a result of coming forward. On the other hand, a man who commits a sexual assault may be able to detach himself from the event or deny it happened until he believes it. He can “choose” whether or not to live with the scars his actions created. Remember, he is taught to temper his feelings and emotions.

We wonder why they don’t come forward.

 Even when there is enough strength in numbers and solidarity among women who have been sexually assaulted, their accusations still may not be taken seriously. The #MeToo movement is a perfect example. Women, who finally get the courage to tell their stories after hearing from another victim, are vilified for coming forward. They are blamed of piling on the men they accuse, especially if it is many years later. They are questioned about their motives, as if some monetary award is enough to erase their memories of being sexually assaulted. Of course their movement is viewed as hostile and unworthy of attention.

We wonder why they don’t come forward.

Until we end raising boys who are taught to always be tough and physical, women will continue to be victims of sexual assault.

Until we end raising boys who are taught to temper their feelings and emotions, women will continue to be victims of sexual assault.

Until we end raising boys who are taught to possess and conquer, women will continue to be victims of sexual assault.

Until we end the process of men protecting other men, women will continue to be victims of sexual assault.

Until we end the thought-process of “boys being boys,” women will continue to be victims of sexual assault.

Until we end the process of shaming female victims, women will continue to be victims of sexual assault.

Until we end the process of disregarding the courage of those who take a stand, women will continue to be victims of sexual assault.

We wonder why they don’t come forward.

 

 

Gary A. McAbee created the Wake Up/Rise Up Black America blog to have a powerful voice and positive impact in African-American neighborhoods, communities, and society. The articles posted are not only for African-Americans, but for all people due to their relevance and cultural significance. Along with his other blog, Motivation for the World, Gary is able to get people talking about issues that affect us all. He is the proud author of three self-help books: Wake Up! 42 Ways to Improve Black America Now!, the follow-up Rise Up! 42 Additional Ways to Improve Black America Now! , and Defining Success: One Word at a Time.